TL;DR
Marketing may bring claimants to a law firm, but the next steps depend on how the firm manages and prepares each enquiry for review. Some individuals require a callback, while others need clarification before scheduling a consultation.
Legal intake services support these interactions by gathering information attorneys require and following up on outstanding steps. This approach helps organise enquiry management. However, whether representation proceeds also depends on the case's merits and the claimant's preferences.
Legal intake services support a claimant's initial contact with a firm. Agents gather relevant details through firm-approved questionnaires and, when authorised, arrange consultations.
A legal intake call centre follows the firm's procedures for recording information. Questions requiring legal analysis are routed to designated attorneys.
The scope should reflect the firm's practice areas. An intake process for personal injury enquiries will differ from one designed for family law matters.
Reviewing enquiry records can reveal where additional attention would be useful:
Record the next action and who will handle it. Separate matters outside the firm’s practice areas from enquiries awaiting further attention.
Dedicated intake supports the process from initial enquiry through attorney review. The following are ways it can assist:
Agents answer inquiries during scheduled hours and return missed calls according to the firm's procedures. After-hours coverage can accommodate people who find it difficult to call during the working day.
Set response targets that align with available staffing. Agents should have a designated contact for enquiries that require escalation.
Practice-specific questions establish whether an enquiry appears to match the firm's scope. For example, a personal injury call centre might record when an incident occurred so an attorney can review the timeline.
Agents refer uncertain responses to the firm. Attorneys assess legal merit and determine relevant filing deadlines.
Consistent intake records help avoid requesting information already provided. Agents document responses and note any missing details.
Attorneys can review these records before continuing the conversation. Clear notes also distinguish reported information from unanswered questions.
Agents schedule approved consultations and explain how to attend. Reminders provide an opportunity to confirm the appointment or reschedule.
Follow-up should be based on the individual's current status. Once a person has scheduled or declined further contact, agents update the record to prevent duplicate outreach.
A shared queue shows which enquiries await action. Assigning each record to a responsible person helps staff monitor outstanding work.
Regular reviews can reveal where additional intake support would help. They can also identify records that need attorney attention before agents can proceed.
These functions support enquiry progression. It is useful to review whether claimants reach consultations and whether appropriate matters proceed to engagement, rather than measuring intake solely by contact volume.
The firm directs how and where outsourced agents collect information and refer questions. Agreeing on responsibilities before launch establishes a consistent approach:
A designated supervising attorney can review intake practices against applicable professional obligations. Periodic reviews also provide an opportunity to address questions agents encounter in actual conversations.
Firms considering outsourced legal intake should compare proposals to their current workflow. Legal process outsourcing providers offer varying services, so confirm whether the arrangement includes only administrative intake or additional legal work.
Before launch, agree on:
Request sample intake records to evaluate how the provider documents enquiries. Reviewing a scenario with incomplete information can also indicate when agents request guidance.
1. How do legal intake services differ from answering services?
Answering services generally capture messages and route calls, which is not what SVC offers. Legal intake adds firm-specific screening and documented follow-up, depending on the agreed scope.
2. Can intake agents decide whether a firm accepts a case?
Yes, if within the scope of work. Agents follow guidelines and tag the claimant's case for attorney review.
3. Can small law firms outsource intake?
Yes. Firms can arrange support for selected hours or tasks. Compare provider minimums with enquiry volumes and supervision requirements.
4. Can outsourced legal intake support case conversion?
It can help with timely contact and scheduling consultations. Whether an engagement follows also reflects case suitability and the claimant's decision.
5. Which intake metrics should law firms track?
Review response times alongside consultation attendance. Signed engagements provide further context, while pending records show what still requires action.
Identify which aspects of your intake process require additional attention. After-hours enquiries may require broader coverage, and pending callbacks may benefit from dedicated follow-up.
Select VoiceCom provides preliminary client screening and appointment-setting support, along with application support and case management services. Legal support options include after-hours coverage, so firms can staff arrangements to match their intake requirements.
Share your current enquiry process to help determine an appropriate scope. Contact Select VoiceCom or request a free quote to discuss available options.
MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS